File Your TTAB Answer Today

Create an account to upload your opposition notice, review an AI-generated draft Answer, and download your ready-to-file documents. All in under 30 minutes.

Powered by ChatGPT 5.1

How It Works

  1. 1

    Create Account

    Sign up or log in to access your dashboard and start creating.

  2. 2

    Upload Documents

    Upload all opposition documents you received from the USPTO.

  3. 3

    Preview Answer

    Review the AI-generated Answer before making payment.

  4. 4

    Download & File

    Get your documents instantly and file with the TTAB via ESTTA.

“I was a solo business owner facing a large company with deep pockets. I couldn't afford a lawyer, but AI-generated filing helped me respond on time and keep fighting for my trademark.”

— James, Small Business Owner

What Your Answer Will Look Like

Here's a sample of the professional TTAB Answer document we generate

Sample Document
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
OPPOSITION NO. 91234567
U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Serial No. 90/123,456
ACME CORPORATION
v.
JANE DOE

ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION

Applicant Jane Doe, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby answers the Notice of Opposition filed by Opposer ACME Corporation as follows:

1. Applicant admits the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of the Notice of Opposition.

2. Applicant admits that Opposer owns a valid trademark registration for the mark "ACME" but denies that there is any likelihood of confusion between the marks.

3. Applicant denies the remaining allegations contained in paragraphs 3 through 10 of the Notice of Opposition.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

11. The Opposer's mark "ACME" is weak and entitled to a narrow scope of protection because it is a common and descriptive term used extensively in the industry for various goods and services.

12. Applicant's goods and services are sold through entirely different channels of trade to different classes of consumers, eliminating any possibility of confusion.

13. Applicant has used its mark in good faith for many years without any actual confusion or complaints from Opposer, establishing secondary meaning and priority rights.

14. The differences in the appearance, sound, and commercial impression of the marks are such that no reasonable consumer would be confused.

Respectfully submitted,

Jane Doe
Applicant, pro se
Date: 12/5/2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Answer to Notice of Opposition was served on the Opposer at the following email address(es) on 12/5/2025:

• counsel@acme.com

• service@acmelegal.com

Jane Doe
Applicant, pro se

This is a sample Answer generated by our AI system. Your actual document will be customized with your specific case details and ready for immediate filing with the TTAB.

Simple, Transparent Pricing

One plan with everything you need

$99

PDF + Word + Cloud Backup

Complete package with permanent access and magic link recovery.

  • AI-generated Answer PDF + Word
  • Permanent cloud storage
  • Magic link for future downloads
  • Email delivery

Need help?

Email support@trademarkanswer.com — average response time under 2 hours during business days.

TrademarkAnswer.com is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.

© 2025 TrademarkAnswer.com. All rights reserved.